Comments on: The Larry Summers Dust Up: Women vs Paleolithic Role Models

By: Nicholas

Nicholas — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:56:04 +0000

jEyFM0qcwRE6e

By: Kiuku

Kiuku — Sat, 06 Dec 2008 21:26:05 +0000

I can prove that MEN are genetically inferior in just about everything except physical prowess. Because even though they have selected against women, and have oppressed women since matriarchies were demolished by them in most opportunities, women still hold nearly all the most important “Firsts”. First astronomer, first mathematics, first novel, first system of writing. And women still continue, when given the chance, to excell past men and improve at speeds greater than them, almost 2 times them in ALL areas, even physical prowess.

It’s men who are inferior in all respects.

By: kitkat

kitkat — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 02:35:16 +0000

If Summers had said that blacks were genetically inferior in math and science, would Obama elevate Summers to this position? I think not.

By: Repackaging Larry Summers: “Maybe women really are dumb, after all” : The New Agenda

Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:19:41 +0000

[...] New Agenda co-founder Gretchen Glasscock has a great post up on her blog entitled, “The Larry Summers Dust Up: Women vs Paleolithic Role Models”, responding to “Was Summers right?” in the Washington Post yesterday, where she says [...]

By: SantaFeK

SantaFeK — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 20:44:19 +0000

This is a very good post. I’m sending it around to my list. It truly appalls me that Larry Summers could have the powerful position he’s been nominated for. The Obama Admin. gives a blessing of approval to his egregious behavior by doing this, or should I say, and administration “oink?”