<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AW WebBiz &#38; Social Media Blog &#187; New Agenda women activist group</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.advancingwomen.com/wordpress/tag/new-agenda-women-activist-group/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.advancingwomen.com/wordpress</link>
	<description>Mentoring, Tools &#38; Strategy To Succeed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 21:42:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Sally Krawcheck: Is it a Woman Thing? &#124; Business Pundit</title>
		<link>http://www.advancingwomen.com/wordpress/sally-krawcheck-is-it-a-woman-thing-business-pundit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.advancingwomen.com/wordpress/sally-krawcheck-is-it-a-woman-thing-business-pundit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gretchen Glasscock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business At The Speed Of Thought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs, Employment, Career Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Siskind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marie Wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Agenda women activist group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women in business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women in Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women more impacted by hard times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women on Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advancingwomen.com/wordpress/?p=503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sally Krawcheck: Is it a Woman Thing? &#124; Business Pundit. Here is a blog we are absolutely aching to get some comments on from women with different perspectives. Particularly such statements as : &#8220;I don’t understand where women stand anymore. ’70s-style feminism is clearly defined in my mind, but it’s been a long time since [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.businesspundit.com/sally-krawcheck-is-it-a-woman-thing/">Sally Krawcheck: Is it a Woman Thing? | Business Pundit</a>.</p>
<p>Here is a blog we are absolutely aching to get some comments on from women with different perspectives. Particularly such statements as :</p>
<p><strong>&#8220;I don’t understand where women stand anymore. </strong>’70s-style feminism is clearly defined in my mind, but it’s been a long time since then. What do women want most these days? Symbolic strength? A voice from a sister? Traditional roles?</p>
<p>Anyone?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.businesspundit.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/krawcheck.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-5463" title="krawcheck" src="http://www.businesspundit.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/krawcheck.jpg" alt="" width="320" height="221" align="right" /></a></p>
<p>From <a href="http://www.portfolio.com/news-markets/top-5/2008/09/22/Sallie-Krawcheck-to-Leave-Citigroup?tid=true">Conde Nast Portfolio</a>:</p>
<p><em><strong>Citigroup’s <a class="zem_slink" title="Sallie Krawcheck" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sallie_Krawcheck">Sallie Krawcheck</a>, one of the highest-profile women on Wall Street, will step down</strong><span>, according to <a class="IL_LINK_STYLE" style="border-bottom: 1px solid #04656e; text-decoration: underline; color: #04656e;" href="javascript:void(0)">the Wall Street Journal</a>. She heads Citigroup’s wealth-management unit, which is being moved into the bank’s institutional group as a part of a broad restructuring.</span></em></p>
<p><em><span><span>Krawcheck was recruited by former chief executive <a class="zem_slink" title="Sanford I. Weill" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanford_I._Weill">Sandy Weill</a> in 2002 to run the <a class="zem_slink" title="Smith Barney" rel="homepage" href="http://www.smithbarney.com/">Smith Barney</a> business. She rose to become the bank’s <a class="IL_LINK_STYLE" style="border-bottom: 1px solid #04656e; text-decoration: underline; color: #04656e;" href="javascript:void(0)">chief financial officer</a> for three years until 2007, when she was moved </span><a class="IL_LINK_STYLE" style="border-bottom: 1px solid #04656e; text-decoration: underline; color: #04656e;" href="javascript:void(0)">to the head</a> of Citi’s wealth-management business as part of an overhaul of the bank’s top ranks.</span></em></p>
<p><em>This is just the latest in a string of senior-ranking female departures on Wall Street. Last November, <a class="zem_slink" title="Zoe Cruz" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoe_Cruz">Zoe Cruz</a> was asked to resign from her post as co-president of <a class="zem_slink" title="Morgan Stanley" rel="homepage" href="http://www.morganstanley.com">Morgan Stanley</a> after the department she oversaw made a series of disastrous subprime trades.</em></p>
<p><em><span><span>And then in June, Lehman fired its </span></span>chief financial officer Erin Callan after investors raised questions about the bank’s financial statements. Lehman’s <a class="IL_LINK_STYLE" style="border-bottom: 1px solid #04656e; text-decoration: underline; color: #04656e;" href="javascript:void(0)">bankruptcy</a> filing early last week is seen by some as vindication for Callan.</em></p>
<p><span>Journalist Megan Barnett wisely points out that while <a class="IL_LINK_STYLE" style="border-bottom: 1px solid #04656e; text-decoration: underline; color: #04656e;" href="javascript:void(0)">investment</a> banks recently fired several high-ranking women, the fact remains that there aren’t many </span>investment banks left, either.</p>
<p><strong>Does Krawcheck’s layoff mean anything for the women’s movement? </strong>Does it mean anything at all?</p>
<p>Looking at this from a women’s interest perspective, the moral of the story is that Wall Street will fire executives when in a pinch, whether they’re female or not. The message to women is that they, too, can become Mistresses of the Universe. Victory! Except that women, too, can be fired at the turn of the market. Darn.</p>
<p><span>There’s so much contradictory news circulating through <a class="IL_LINK_STYLE" style="border-bottom: 1px solid #04656e; text-decoration: underline; color: #04656e;" href="javascript:void(0)">the Internet</a> today that </span><strong>I can’t make sense of what women’s interest means anymore</strong>:</p>
<p>1) <em>Men with egalitarian attitudes about the role of women in society earn significantly less on average than men who hold more traditional views about women’s place in the world, according to a study being reported today.</em> (<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/21/AR2008092102529.html?hpid=topnews">Washington Post</a>)</p>
<p><strong>Moral:</strong><span> Empirical evidence has shown that men who know their place, and a woman’s place, <a class="IL_LINK_STYLE" style="border-bottom: 1px solid #04656e; text-decoration: underline; color: #04656e;" href="javascript:void(0)">make more</a> money.</span></p>
<p><strong>Message:</strong><span> Real men </span></p>
<input name="IL_MARKER" type="hidden" />make more money than sissy-boys. Feminist egalitarianism victimizes men. Here’s the math to prove it.</p>
<p>2) <em>A quote from Norla, a small-town American woman, on voting for <a class="zem_slink" title="Sarah Palin" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Palin">Sarah Palin</a>: “…if not [Palin], it’s just the old-boys network again.” Palin’s small-town credentials appeal to Norla, although she has questions about Palin’s experience. “But what the heck? A lot of people didn’t have experience before they got in, and she’s got a lot of good common sense.”</em> (<a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/09/22/palin_heartland/index1.html">Salon</a>)</p>
<p><strong>Moral: </strong>This small-town woman thinks Palin, by virtue of being a woman, cannot possibly also be part of the old boys’ network. Gender matters more than experience or connections.</p>
<p><strong>Message:</strong> You’re pro-woman if you vote for a woman. Any woman. Regardless of whether you agree with her viewpoints or not.</p>
<p>3) <em>(Republican pollster Kellyanne) Conway said more women will vote than men this fall – as has happened in every presidential election since 1964 – and will be a deciding factor. Less than two months ago, Mr. McCain was trailing Mr. Obama significantly among women, and “now they are now pretty much neck and neck.”</em> (<a href="http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/politics/national/stories/092208dnpolwomen.9ff65e99.html">Dallas Morning News</a>)</p>
<p><strong>Moral:</strong> Women have the power to sway the elections.</p>
<p><strong>Question:</strong> Are you more pro-woman if you vote for a woman, in the flesh, or a man whom you believe stands for women more than the actual woman?</p>
<p><strong>I don’t understand where women stand anymore. </strong>’70s-style feminism is clearly defined in my mind, but it’s been a long time since then. What do women want most these days? Symbolic strength? A voice from a sister? Traditional roles?</p>
<p>Anyone? &#8221;</p>
<p>Please send us your perspective, your thoughts and feedback.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.businesspundit.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/krawcheck.jpg"><br />
</a></p>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em;">Related articles by Zemanta</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www10.nytimes.com/2008/09/23/business/23citi.html?_r=5&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin">Most Prominent Woman on Wall Street Is Out at Citi</a></li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/marie-wilson/in-women-we-trust-how-wal_b_128727.html">Marie Wilson: In Women We Trust: How Wall Street Could Have Avoided Our Economic Meltdown</a></li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Zemified by Zemanta" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/610f10f1-8174-4144-b95b-0b4dc0fe6335/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=610f10f1-8174-4144-b95b-0b4dc0fe6335" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.advancingwomen.com/wordpress/sally-krawcheck-is-it-a-woman-thing-business-pundit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lynette Long: NEW AGENDA TARGETS CHRIS MATTHEWS FROM LA TIMES</title>
		<link>http://www.advancingwomen.com/wordpress/lynette-long-new-agenda-targets-chris-matthews-from-la-times/</link>
		<comments>http://www.advancingwomen.com/wordpress/lynette-long-new-agenda-targets-chris-matthews-from-la-times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gretchen Glasscock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Level The Playing Field In The Political Arena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Siskind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Matthews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Olbermann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misogyeny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misogynistic journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Agenda women activist group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexism in politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexism in the media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advancingwomen.com/wordpress/?p=453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lynette Long: NEW AGENDA TARGETS CHRIS MATTHEWS FROM LA TIMES. MSNBC&#8217;s Chris Matthews remains in the bull&#8217;s eye for new women&#8217;s group Forget the battle for the White House &#8212; here&#8217;s a campaign that&#8217;s really heating up: the bid by a new women&#8217;s group to hold Chris Matthews accountable for what it asserts is &#8220;misogynistic [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lynettelong.com/my_weblog/2008/09/new-agenda-targ.html">Lynette Long: NEW AGENDA TARGETS CHRIS MATTHEWS FROM LA TIMES</a>.</p>
<div class="entry-content">
<div class="entry-body">
<div id="ygrp-msg" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 25px 0px 0px; z-index: 1; float: left; width: 470px;">
<div id="ygrp-text">
<p><strong></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; color: #333333;"><img src="http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2007-09-10-ChrisMatthewstieredux.JPG" alt="" /></span></span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; color: #333333;"><a title="MSNBC's Chris Matthews remains in the bull's eye for new women's group" href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/09/msnbcs-chris-ma.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: #163f68;"><span style="color: #163f68; text-decoration: none;">MSNBC&#8217;s Chris Matthews remains in the bull&#8217;s eye for new women&#8217;s group</span></span></a></span></span></strong></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-size: 9pt; color: #333333; font-family: Arial;">Forget the battle for the White House &#8212; here&#8217;s a campaign that&#8217;s <em></em><em><span style="font-family: Arial;">really </span></em>heating up: the bid by a new women&#8217;s group to hold <strong></strong><strong><span style="font-family: Arial;">Chris Matthews</span></strong> accountable for what it asserts is &#8220;misogynistic journalism&#8221; practiced by the voluble MSNBC political pundit.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-size: 9pt; color: #333333; font-family: Arial;"><span>The New Agenda, a nonpartisan organization promoting women&#8217;s rights, today </span><a href="http://thenewagenda.net/september-16-2008-letter-to-mr-jeff-zucker/" target="_blank"><strong><span style="color: #163f68;"><span style="font-weight: bold; color: #163f68; text-decoration: none;">sent a letter</span></span></strong></a><span> to NBC Universal President <strong></strong><strong><span style="font-family: Arial;">Jeff Zucker</span></strong> asking for a meeting to discuss Matthews&#8217; attitude toward women.</span><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/.shared/image.html?/photos/uncategorized/2008/09/16/chris_2.jpg" target="_blank"><strong></strong></a><span> </span></span></span></p>
<p><span><strong></strong><strong><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-size: 9pt; color: #333333; font-family: Arial;">Amy Siskind</span></span></strong></span><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-size: 9pt; color: #333333; font-family: Arial;">, one of the group&#8217;s founders, said in an interview it wants Matthews (at right, with <strong></strong><strong><span style="font-family: Arial;">Ron Reagan</span></strong> behind him) to issue a public apology and change his on-air behavior. Absent that, he needs to be fired, she said&#8230;</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-size: 9pt; color: #333333; font-family: Arial;">The group&#8217;s letter applauded the recent decision by MSNBC to remove Matthews and <strong></strong><strong><span style="font-family: Arial;">Keith Olbermann</span></strong> from prominent roles anchoring political events, but said more action is needed.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-size: 9pt; color: #333333; font-family: Arial;">&#8220;MSNBC can regain its reputation as a respectable news organization by taking more appropriate action against Chris Matthews,&#8221; the letter said. &#8220;If Matthews were an employee in a Fortune 500 company, he would have been fired for sexual harassment long ago. Instead, MSNBC peddled misogynistic journalism to the American public.&#8221;</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-size: 9pt; color: #333333; font-family: Arial;"><span>Compiling a list of actions that it deemed offensive, The New Agenda wrote that the &#8220;Hardball&#8221; host a couple of years asked if </span><a href="http://topics.latimes.com/politics/people/nancy-pelosi" target="_blank"><span><strong></strong><strong><span style="color: #163f68;"><span style="color: #163f68; font-family: Arial; text-decoration: none;">House Speaker</span></span></strong><strong><span style="color: #163f68;"><span style="font-weight: bold; color: #163f68; text-decoration: none;"> <strong></strong><strong><span style="font-family: Arial;">Nancy Pelosi</span></strong></span></span></strong></span></a></span></span><span> would &#8220;castrate&#8221; a fellow Democrat with whom she had feuded, Rep. <strong></strong><strong><span style="font-family: Arial;">Steny Hoyer</span></strong> of Maryland.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-size: 9pt; color: #333333; font-family: Arial;"><span>The letter also faults Matthews for likening <strong></strong><strong><span style="font-family: Arial;"><a href="http://topics.latimes.com/politics/people/hillary-rodham-clinton" target="_blank"><span style="color: #163f68;"><span style="color: #163f68; text-decoration: none;">Hillary Clinton</span></span></a>,</span></strong> during the Democratic primary campaign, to Nurse Ratched, the power-mad character from <strong></strong><strong><span style="font-family: Arial;">Ken Kesey&#8217;s</span></strong> novel &#8220;One Flew Over the Cuckoo&#8217;s Nest.&#8221;</span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-size: 9pt; color: #333333; font-family: Arial;">&#8220;The historic candidacies of both Hillary Clinton and [Republican vice presidential nominee] <strong></strong><strong><span style="font-family: Arial;"><a href="http://topics.latimes.com/politics/people/sarah-palin" target="_blank"><span style="color: #163f68;"><span style="color: #163f68; text-decoration: none;">Sarah Palin</span></span></a></span></strong> have brought to light for all Americans the rampant sexism in the media,&#8221; the letter said. </span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #333333;"><span style="font-size: 9pt; color: #333333; font-family: Arial;">For the complete post go to </span></span><a href="http://www.lynettelong.com/my_weblog/2008/09/new-agenda-targ.html">Lynette Long: NEW AGENDA TARGETS CHRIS MATTHEWS FROM LA TIMES</a>.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.advancingwomen.com/wordpress/lynette-long-new-agenda-targets-chris-matthews-from-la-times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>