Tag Archives: Carly Fiorina

WHY SOME WOMEN HATE SARAH PALIN

Put her out of her misery, please

Image by bobster1985 via Flickr

Lynette Long: WHY SOME WOMEN HATE SARAH PALIN.

This post by Belinda Luscombe was pretty enlightening for me in an unfortunate way.  I have been wondering why a number of women I know and respect get apoplectic at the mention of Sarah Palin.  You can almost see sparks shooting from their hair.  When I try to say “A lot of women are not so much for Sarah Palin as they are against the media riculing her or the talking heads disparaging her” ( because someday we really would like a woman vice president or, better yet, president).  The response I often get, after a rolling of the eyes upward is “No one is disparaging her.  Or at least they’re not disparaging women in general.” I see.  Well, actually, I don’t.  But after reading Belinda Luscombe’s post, I’m beginning to.

Some polls are suggesting that after gaining an initial bump, McCain‘s campaign is being hobbled by Sarah Palin‘s vice-presidential candidacy. The voters who are deserting her fastest, some of whom are even calling on her to withdraw, are mostly women.

Ah, women, the consistently, tragically underestimated constituency. What the Democrats learned during the primaries and the Republicans might now be finding out the hard way, I learned at my very academic, well-regarded all-girls high school: that is never to discount the ability of women to open a robust, committed, well-thought-out vat of hatred for another girl.

It’s a simple three-point pass-fail exam: Will the other girls like her?

Here’s why Palin doesn’t make the grade:

1. She’s too pretty. This is very bad news. At school, pretty girls tend to be liked only by other pretty girls. The rest of us, whose looks hover somewhere around underwhelming, resent them and whisper archly of their “unearned attention.” So, if everyone calls your candidate “hot,” you’re in a whole mess of trouble. If the Pakistani head-of-state more or less hits on her, well, yes, she’ll get a sympathy vote, but we’re in Dukakis-in-the-tank territory. It’s an admiration vaporizer. (Of course a candidate can’t be too ugly, or it will scare the men, who are clearly shallow as a gender.)

2. She’s too confident. This also bodes ill. Women have self-esteem issues. But they also have other-women’s-esteem issues. As almost any woman – from the head of the Budgerigar Breeders association to Queen Elizabeth – can attest, it’s almost impossible to get confidence right. Too timid and you’re a pushover. Too self-aggrandizing and you’re a bad word unless it’s about a dog, or Project Runway‘s Kenley. Or Michelle, my best friend until 9th grade, after she won that debating prize and got cocky.

3. She could embarrass us. History is not on Palin’s side. Every time a woman gets a plum job, be she Hewlett-Packard‘s ex-boss, Carly Fiorina, or CBS‘s Katie Couric, there’s always that whispery fear that people will think she got the job just because she’s a woman. So if things don’t go well – and a couple of YouTube clips have suggested that they’re certainly not going well for Palin – women are the first to turn on her for making it harder for the rest of us to louse up at work.”

The fact of the matter is once a female decides it’s over with another female, it’s like an end-stage marriage. No matter how seemingly benign, every attribute becomes an affront: the hair, the voice, the husband, the moose-shooting, the glasses, the big family, the making rape victims pay for their own rape test kits.

I know, I know. With all this extra baggage a female candidate has to bear, the chances of finding a woman whom other women won’t hate seem skinnier than last year’s jeans. But don’t despair, if all else fails, we could just do what we always do and just vote in some guy. It’s worked so well for us in the past.”

Fo the entire post go to Lynette Long: WHY SOME WOMEN HATE SARAH PALIN.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Large Ambitions, Goals – Small Methodical Steps To Achieve Them

Gretchen Glasscock

In order to become successful in the workplace, you must think large, envisioning yourself as ready to step into the CEO slot on a moment’s notice. At the same time, when addressing your work tasks, you must think small. No matter how grand the task or crucial the outcome, you must approach it methodically in bite size chunks. In fact, one executive primer, when advising how to approach an overwhelming task asks: “How do you eat an elephant?” Answer: “One bite at a time.”  If we are able to envision large projects as made up of small, manageable pieces, they are not so daunting and we realize we can readily achieve them.

It is also possible to break down your career goals into manageable pieces.  Before Carly Fiorina became the president, CEO and Chairman of the Board of Fortune 500 Hewlett-Packard, then adviser to Repubican presidential candidate John McCain, she had worked as a secretary, a receptionist and taught English in Italy. Ultimately she went on to get a BA from Stanford, and an MBA from the University of Maryland and, then she realized, like a camel passing through the eye of a needle, in order to reach the top slot,  she would need one more credential and she went out and got it:  a Master of Science in management from the MIT Sloan School of Mangement.  When she joined AT&T, created the powerful eye-catching  red circular splash of color that was to be Lucent logo,  then  directed the company’s strategy and orchestrated its initial public offering (IPO), the most successful IPO in U.S. history up to that point in time, Fiorina beame a star with amazing firepower.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/62/CarlyFiorina49416.jpegIn corporate America continuing to increase your skills, experience and credentials are one sure route to the top.  In the world of small business, entrepreneurs often get to the top by their sheer grit and tenacity, by feverishly attacking every task in a business, working long and grueling hours and gaining hard won business insight and savvy along the way.

Ruth Fertel, founder of Ruth’s Chris Steak House, launched an $300 million restaurant chain throughout the U.S. Mexico, Puerto Rico and Taiwan by realizing she needed more money to send her kids to school and taking a flyer on a restaurant listed for sale in her local newspaper. She worked sixteen hours a day, learned to butcher, cook, do the books, mix drinks, wait tables and seat people. No doubt she had an abundance of stamina, perseverance and charisma to carry her on to success.

When you are an entrepreneur, launching a small business, the distance from the bottom to the top is not so great, and you are not only calling the shots as but proving yourself by your ultimate success . You are the CEO, as well as the chief bottle washer, from Day 1, so that is how you envision yourself and how others accept you.

In corporate America, it’s harder to envision oneself as CEO, because you don’t see many women in the CEO slot. It’s easier to think of yourself as reaching a pinnacle as executive vice president, or possibly chief financial officer. But you should never sell yourself short. Low expectations can be a self fulfilling prophecy.
By setting your own goals, it is possible, in corporate America, to replicate the kind of training Ruth Fertel and other entrepreneurs have, gaining experience in every part of the corporation – marketing, sales and operations – “by remaining open to cross-training and working with cross-functional teams”. When a women diversifies her work experience, she prepares herself to handle any task she’s assigned, an invaluable professional asset.

“According to Sandra Woods, vice president and chief environmental, health and safety office at Coors Brewing Company, the best way for women to promote themselves” is to accept challenges enthusiastically and not have a limited view of what they can do. They need to build a really broad base within the corporation” Woods advises. “Business today is saying Get out of your silos. See the way you interconnect.”
And remember the importance of being able to think big and small at the same time: Big ambitions, goals and capabilities – small, methodical steps to accomplish each goal, however large.  And, like Carly Fiorina, learn to project self confidence, radiate authority and dominate whatever stage you’re on.  As you succeed, your stage will get larger.

The Difference Between Democrats and Republicans Handling of Sexism

The Difference : NO QUARTER.

Between how the Republicans deal with sexism in this election, and how the Democrats have dealt with sexism is mighty telling. The latter were mum, until after Hillary conceded the race then they made some noise about how things weren’t so great on the whole woman thing. The one exception was Geraldine Ferraro standing up for Hillary. She got labeled a racist for her trouble. I should add, not only did the DNC not speak up, they actually got in a few digs, too.

Not so the Republicans. I take NO credit for these next two pieces at all – they came from alert readers at No Quarter. The first one is from “Hope Floats,” who posted the following article:

“Gov. Palin’s experience is in running a state,” added Swift. “Barack Obama’s experience, as he himself has said, is in running a campaign.”

Joining Swift in her denunciations were senior McCain aide Carly Fiorina, Rep. Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee, former U.S. Treasurer Rosario Marin and Renee Amore, Deputy Chairman of the Pennsylvania Republican Party.

“The Republican Party will not stand by while Gov. Palin is subjected to sexist attacks,” said Fiorina, who explained that all the women on stage had experienced sexism in their careers. “I don’t believe American women are going to stand for it either.”

“It is quite interesting that Gov. Palin has managed the state of Alaska with 24,000 employees and a $10 billion budget,” said Blackburn. “How many men have done that?”

Amore was more direct. Referring to the media, she said, “You never talk about that Barack Obama hasn’t run anything.”

“These smears are meant to distract from the fact that Gov. Palin has more experience than Barack Obama,” said Amore. She then issued a humorous, if also serious, challenge: “Let me use some ebonics … We will get with you, if you keep messing with us.”

There wasn’t a link to the post, but here is a VIDEO you can watch.

And then, frequent commenter Paul Villareal has several YouTube videos up, particularly this one in which Newt Gingrich (I know – I am as surprised by this as anybody) lays into a MSNBC reporter on the differences between Governor Palin and Barack Obama (again, she’s second on the ticket, Obama is first – and HE STILL COMES UP SHORT IN THE COMPARISON!!!). Anyway, take a look The end is a hoot: