<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AW WebBiz &#38; Social Media Blog &#187; Biden</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.advancingwomen.com/wordpress/tag/biden/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.advancingwomen.com/wordpress</link>
	<description>Mentoring, Tools &#38; Strategy To Succeed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 21:42:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Lipstick on a Pig</title>
		<link>http://www.advancingwomen.com/wordpress/lipstick-on-a-pig/</link>
		<comments>http://www.advancingwomen.com/wordpress/lipstick-on-a-pig/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 13:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gretchen Glasscock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Level The Playing Field In The Political Arena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leveling the playing field for women in politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexism in politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.advancingwomen.com/wordpress/?p=370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lipstick on a Pig &#8211; The Corner on National Review Online. Well, to my question “does anybody really think Obama meant to call Sarah Palin a pig?” the answer appears to be “yes, about a gazillion and a half emailers do think so,” though another half a gazillion don’t. And the video without question looks [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=OTM3NWY5YzQ0ZTNjYmMyZmY1MTU4MzdmNTU5Y2JmMWY=">Lipstick on a Pig &#8211; The Corner on National Review Online</a>.</p>
<p>Well, to my question “does anybody really think Obama meant to call Sarah Palin a pig?” the answer appears to be “yes, about a gazillion and a half emailers do think so,” though another half a gazillion don’t. And the video without question looks very very bad. The audience certainly seems to take him to refer to Palin. I think Obama’s choice of words was unbelievably stupid (as it so very often is when he’s not chained to a teleprompter), and I certainly think both he and Biden have completely lost their cool because of Palin and are getting hysterical—Biden’s ugly reference to Palin’s Down syndrome child and stem cell research today is one example. But did he set out to call Palin (or McCain) names? I think it’s a bad gaffe, not an attack. That’s bad enough, but the McCain folks themselves shouldn’t overreact. Let them melt down. <a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerkimball/2008/09/09/palin-rule-1-no-whining-give-the-pig-thing-a-rest/">Roger Kimball</a> has it right.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/FPd4yk0x-eg&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/FPd4yk0x-eg&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.advancingwomen.com/wordpress/lipstick-on-a-pig/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>